Okay. I'd like to welcome you all to the first spring meeting of the faculty senate. >> The usual reminders, I put my phone on airport airplane mode and we do have IUD capture of this meeting. >> So the first item is the adoption of the agenda. I have a summary here in case you have not looked at it carefully. >> Hairs. >> So the first item, adoption or is there a motion to second with any discussion? >> All those in favor, could you raise your clickers and vote? >> A is yes. B. >> Now C is I'm not going to. >> Okay. >> I think so. >> Looks like everyone voted in favor of adopting the agenda, so we move on. The second item is the approval of the minutes. Is there a motion to approve the minutes? I can. >> Ok. Any questions about the minutes? >> Any discussion than none? >> Then we'll go through the process of voting by clickers again. Okay? >> I think we got as many procedure here. >> Oh, clickers, you're supposed to say well in favor and raise your clicker and vote in favor. >> And then I will do that for the resolutions. Yes. And thank you for pointing that out. But it was pointed out to me that when you vote, you should raise your Clay Carson. >> And because we are trying to simulate the yellow card voting. >> And so and then click send it. >> I got an idea, yet a point. >> But regardless, which raises the clicker card, it has to be the yeses first and then the nose, right? >> Can't just be everyone raised their clicker, unquote. >> Likelihood the cars all in favor, but like yes, off all posed. Click now, whatever. Okay. We'll do that next item on the agenda. I remarks by President dishonest and welcome to the back of the tent. >> Good afternoon, everybody, and welcome to our Spring semester. I know that all of you have recharge your batteries over this intercession or winter time and you've made the most out of it, so we're thrilled to have you back. So I would like to just take a few minutes to start to update you on the progress that we've been making towards dev five institutional priorities that we have been articulating throughout the fall semester. I know a number of you attended the meeting, faculty meeting, where I articulated for the first time those priorities. And we've had many, many opportunities. In fact, I visited, I would think every college with the exception of one that I'm about to still visit and discuss more with the faculty. And that has been very engaging and indeed very, very informative to me. So I hope that we can continue to move forward. So I will start by saying, To do all these wonderful things, it takes a team effort and a partnership. The partnership is a true partnership if it is a shared one between the administration and the faculty members so that we can truly help our students succeed. That's our most important. Okay, I will only use VRP is also members of my team that I have appointed comes in and then you can see the real human being wherever you get to that in a few minutes. So let me just start and talk a bit about our institutional priorities. And the first one is, you all remember, is to enhance the success of our students. We're all your variables. He says we're doing some things phenomenally well for the first time, our four-year graduation rate as over 72%. That's really, as I said last fall that we wanted to see that go up only a few years ago. It was in the mid sixties, it's now over 72% that this phenomena is really great. Scholarly dial of the AAU public universities that's great. They combine with, and we will continue to work very hard to prove it just in front of this were better capture. Okay, I know you'll be analyzing every statement I make. So, so now we would like to bring it up to 80% and nothing is really stopping us other than the fact we need to pay more attention to cohorts of students that are really not attaining at the same rate as the majority of our students. And I talked about that before. First-generation students, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, under represented minority students, international students, sometimes student athletes. You know, all those cohorts are opportunities. But let me give you a new one. New one is had been starting the data, which I think you're going to find very exciting. Our female students reach a four-year graduation rate as close to 78% are male students have an attainment rate on average of 64%. That is 14 difference in attainment gap between our female students, in our male students. Now we all knew that the females are smarter than us. But 14 points, that's pretty amazing. And so I really urge the Senate to work with the Provost hand-in-hand to appoint a taskforce so we can close that gap, then we can be a truly amazing institution. And let's do that. Let's roll up our sleeves and work. As I said on all, the coach of our students do not today enjoy graduation rate at same level. The next thing, as you should know that what we do, we do it well because again, the statistics keep showing that 92% of our students within six months from graduation are either employed gainfully or are pursuing their next stop in their career, meaning potentially graduate school, serve the military, do whatever they like to do, 92%. That's pretty impressive. Again, now people are realizing that what we do, we do it well. And so for the first time now, it's the pick of the application season. As you know, for the new class, we broken you record there as well. We're over 27 thousand applications. Christmas here or vice present for Roman management is here to answer any questions relate to it. So we're very, very excited about what's happening in terms of the class that we are admitting right now. So those are some of the things with respect to statistics. In terms of efforts, we need to redouble our efforts in terms of advising our students and tutoring students. We have rolled out the blue hand success collaboratory. Again, creases here to answer any questions you have with respect to that. We thank you for your support, those of you who are involved with it, it does take a village if we want to have a stronger attainment rates for our students. And that includes not just academics, but everything else on campus. Student life in particular, you know, Don Thompson and everybody else and her phenomenal team, Jose era and others are working very hard to help our students succeed. That means also financial support when we need to provide financial support to our students so that they succeed. And I'll come back to that in a minute. We've launched some new partnerships because we realize the work starts before they come to campus. The UD partnership for public education, really involving a network which includes the teachers and teacher preparation across the state and parents linking with our own teachers and students. And so the effort starts really from the early childhood, then all through their formative years and into the application period, our commitment to Delaware and remains formidable. It's pretty amazing. We have the world's bargain, but more importantly, we have the world's best value for the education we provide our tuition. That Delaware Ian's pay 60% of the tuition rated R out of students pay, out-of-state students pay. And on top of it, we provide very significant, very substantial support to our students from Delaware. Last year, we spent $23.7 million in scholarships. Only minority of that amount, close to $10 million, was provided by the state. So we provide a lot more of our own resources as scholarship. So hot, very high tuition. It's among the lowest in the peer set of institutions that were looking. And on top of it, we provide very substantial scholarships. 90% of our students from Delaware actually make it into our university. That of course, includes our Pathway program, the Associate in Arts degree, where it is excellent education, as you all know. And in fact that graduation rates from the AA program is three times higher than what you find in other national community college. And so again, we're doing very, very well serving her state, and I hope our state remembers that to budget time. I'll talk a little bit more about that in a minute. I would like now to shift focus a bit and talk about our efforts to build inclusive excellence around campus, which is a very important priority for us, particularly the time that we live in, socioeconomically speaking, in our country, we have again made significant progress in enrolling more minority students. They now make 23% of our undergraduate population compared to less than 19% 5 years ago. We still have lots of work to do. As Carol Henderson and others know here, we will not stop. We're doing a better job constantly enrolling under represented minority, in particular, African American students from Delaware are present. There's about 10% when we look at our class, the incoming class, where we don't do as well as in enrolling minority students who come from out-of-state. And by the way, we're in good company. Everybody else not doing well in that category because it takes significant resources in scholarships to try to attract students from another state, given the tuition differential out-of-state version state. But that is an opportunity area for us to continue to strive. We're spending $22 million a year on diversity programs on our campus and externally, that's very significant commitment that people sometimes don't, don't know. We have also worked very hard to redouble our commitment to bring more diversity in our faculty body and our staff. Clearly, we have a lot of training programs about values, about implicit bias and searches and things of that nature. So we can have better search procedures when we look for a faculty, better makeup of committees Midpoint checks on the search process. So much interval is work with Carol and others from that, as well as mentoring programs once we bring the faculty on board, institutionalizing mentoring is a big agenda item for all of us. Some units to great job, others don't. So we need to learn from each other. And again, we have some wonderful programs like the advanced program, but we just need to make sure that institution wide we're doing a better and better job with mentoring. We're soon going to be announcing a program aimed at mid-career faculty members, essentially an endowed chair for a period of five years to recognize outstanding under represented minority faculty that we're trying to retain or attract to the institution. And that has been possible through the generosity of one of our trustees. The next thing as bringing into our education of our students, stronger interdisciplinary and global focus. Obviously, we're proud of our curriculum. We have it thanks to you. These are the good news. Some of the challenges ahead is we need to continue to be innovators in our curriculum. We've got to get the good things from the days that we were accepted, 1743. But we always need to be thinking about what society needs in the future. Society is truly challenge with some major issues. And as I've said many times, solutions are not going to come from one discipline alone. So we need to educate our students so they can be agile in so that they can learn how to learn through life and adapting to the changing environment. More importantly is how to collaborate with different people. How to be creative, how to be imaginative. How to have a scientist, an engineer work with a social scientist and policy maker, a humanist. That's what he's going to bring total solutions to society. So to that goal, I want to ask all of you, because you own the curriculum. So I want to ask all of you to redouble your efforts to come up with innovative, unresponsive degree offerings, both face-to-face as well as online. What is warranted and to leverage technology to enhance our residential education. That should be a key objective for everybody here. When it comes to graduate education. For three strategic plans in a row, we have been discussing about launching a graduate college. Think the time has come. We clearly need a graduate college to thread across to connect our schools and colleges that are somewhat siloed so that we can work together with new, innovative degree offerings. And so I do hope that the taskforce that our provost, his launch worked with an artist and others will produce fruit. And you're going to hear an update from the medical soon in the area of interdisciplinary education. During my inauguration speech, I mentioned that an opportunity that really is upon us as to elevate their all in our university offer a school of public policy and administration. And we have a unique opportunity called Joe Biden has just recently retired and we had been working nonstop to establish a strong relationship with our celebrated public servant. Read the news tomorrow morning at ten o'clock. So you are going to be very excited and very proud to be a Delaware, to be a faculty member at this historic time and there is more to come. So keep reading the news for the next two months. Don't give up on us too quickly. So the next thing is innovation and entrepreneurship. I came from an event to strengthen the university rolls on engagement with communities, with Wilmington and other communities. And the governor was there today at lunch and he spoke right after me. And all the things he said is I'm looking at you. President Assad has to basically help us with the efforts within this university, a great university, We have the University of Delaware to foster an environment of innovation, entrepreneurship across the state. You are the new DuPont. You are the people who are going to give jobs to this state and to the region. Obviously, I was thrilled to hear it. But then he said, you need to step up your game and meaning about the university, we need to do more. So both true. So what are we doing when we're working hard? We're looking again at the faculty. We hope that you are going to help us truly implement what you discuss in the general education requirement about creativity, imagination, entrepreneurial thinking to instill in each one of our students. On our undergraduate students, we have the whole program, wonderful program, but it is limited. It is touching perhaps a 14050 majors. We have another 17 thousand students to go know how are we going to be able to, to achieve what we want is a tall order. So we want to take advantage of our great university assets are a wonderful teaching university, which at the same time the research university. How can we marry the two to the success of our students? So that's again, something that we look forward to truly partner with you. Another provost wants to work with you and the deans to make this happen. The other piece of it as making a stronger connection between discovery and innovation, which leads to commercialization, startups, and fueling the economy. We have two major wins, and you'll hear more about it from Charlie. Charlie here. Yes, from Charlie, ordinary newly appointed vice president for research, scholarship, and innovation. I added this and innovation because that's an important piece that was missing before. So we have 12 great competitions through the Manufacturing USA Initiative. One as to create Essentially a metamorphosis of the bio pharmaceutical industry. We referred to it as nimble. A team of a 150 individuals and organizations. So many universities, many government agencies, mature industries and start-ups as part of our team. And then a second effort which has its origins in our strength. And obviously reaction and catalysis is called rapid. So I fondly say we've been rapid, the nimble in terms of positioning ourselves to win. And we've done very, very well. We have also a new incubation space at a star, which is called DDP. At star. The day we cut the ribbon, we were full fully occupied with 11 new start-ups. So we're looking now for additional innovation space, hopefully in partnership with coupon. So great, exciting things are happening in innovation and entrepreneurship. Obviously, all these wonderful things in order to make them happen, required resources. I've said several times that we have over $0.5 billion of deferred maintenance and upgrade buildings around the green. That's just to keep up with what we have in the meantime, launching this new initiatives like a graduate college with fellowships for students, perhaps a new building to support interdisciplinary education. Expanding our School of Public Policy rapidly. Nimble innovation, entrepreneurship, all those wonderful things cost money. And I haven't even added athletics in their Chrissy, which also costs money as well. As we know there is having great facilities and a great experience for student athletes are libraries. Everything is hungry for resources. So if you're going to spend about $500 million deferred maintenance. Humans wealth, you know, spend $0.5 billion on exciting new things. Well, that calls for a billion dollars of new resources. So now let's do some reality checks. Are states or State is a great partner, has been historically for many, many years, where land-grant university. At the same time, our state is plagued with some challenges. Financially speaking, we have a $350 million budget gap from Governor Marco moved over now to Governor Carney. This is not going to be an easy period. I can tell you that this is the time when the current is team picked up the recommendations, the marks from McKenzie team and every agency including ourselves, are slated for cuts. How large? Well, I was sort of relieved, quote, unquote, not happy, but relieved when I when I first, when I saw the initial recommendation which had cut back some of our programs, 1%, some 2%, some 10%, 20, 30% percent. But when you took it altogether, it was not the draconian cut. It goes in the range of couple of million dollars and we're ready to go defend their budget in front of the joint Financial Committee of the Senate and the Assembly on February second. That was the second day they open hearings for the various agencies. They told us the Hearing this year is going to be a little different. It could be an hour like all the other years, but rather new. Bragging, you, the President or whoever is leading an agency for 50 minutes and ten minutes for questions will reverse it. You're going to have ten minutes to tell us how great you are. Then 50 minutes for questions line-by-line. So we're scheduled to go on the second day. We're about ready to go. We received a call that they are still reviewing. The first agency that went on the first day. There were supposed to be there for one hour. They had gone on for seven hours. They had finished seven questions out of the 45 questions. So now, my next date is for February ninth. I don't trust that it will hold that, but I mean, this is what it is. In the meantime, we received word that I should be prepared to say what we will do if our budget is cut back by 5%, and what if it is cut back by 10%? Now we're getting into the 6, $12 million range. And by the way, there is a possibility there will be media rescission, meaning I will return money from this year's budget allocation. Not a great situation. Last time that this happened, I think was under President Roosevelt in 2003, where tuition was increased in the spring semester, in the middle of the semester. I hope I'm not the next president will have to do that. But this is what it is. So lots of challenges ahead. No shortage of challenges to work around the presence officer or any of the offices around Julio hall. If any of you would like to volunteer time, I absolutely encourage you to send me a note is an exciting time. And you know, what is making it even more exciting is the wonderful team that we have, the partnership with the facade and the senate. So at this point, and I'm happy to take some questions at the very end, myself as well as my team. I'd like to start introducing my team members. Each one of them will give you a two minute be very succinct overview of who they are so you can put the name and a face together. So we can start with Lori, let me tell you, Nohria again, our chief legal counsel and Vice President. I really did not appoint Lori, but I basically found Lori here on day one and I'm certainly thrilled that she's a part of my team. So Lori, please introduce yourself, Yaakov, here so that they can absolutely, yes. >> Thank you. Hello. Thank you. Most of you know me, I think, although those who don't know me are glad to not know me. I'm the General Counsel. I've been here for about six years and I became the general counsel on the same day that Dennis was appointed or chosen as President. So so we share that in common, that we both kind of came off on November 18th of last year. So again, our office is small. We have three attorneys, myself included, and we represent the university, we represent the institution. So those of you who know us, we help you. >> Do what you do. >> People often ask what's your agenda? >> And the answer is, we don't have an agenda. >> Our agenda is to help the faculty deal with all the issues that you guys run into in the classroom research. Our job is to help the administration deal with all the, let's say, executive orders that are coming down from the White House. And sometimes we don't have all the answers. I'll just put a note out there. >> I was just at a conference last week. >> I was surrounded by 250 general counsels from across the nation. And we talked about the executive order constantly in every session where we're talking, we're asking about the executive session. And I have in my notes quotes no definitive answers at this point, everything is up in the air. And so as soon as we know anything, we're going to share that with the university, we're going to share that with the administration. And we're going to share that so that we can take whatever steps we need to take. I'll ultimately, a lot of laws come out of the state, out of the federal government. And we're not always pleased with the laws. They're not written well and we have to struggle around them. But that's our job is to help us figure out how to stay within the law, do what we gotta do and be here for our students and our faculty. >> So that's what I do see that Thompson's office, here's what the mean is they're seeing their university before. So thank you so much for us to work dummy nested, better planning and analysis. And what I will say by the way of introduction is strategic planning is going to be extremely important in analysis and institutional research. Whereas as we move forward, we have scarce resources. We want to deploy them in the best way. And of course, we want to benchmark the competition. So having said that, didn't leave that much for me to say. >> So I've actually been here about six months. >> I worked with Dennis before when he was at Stony Brook University, so I know what to change he can bring to the institution. So I was very excited to be here and to work with all of you. My job, simply put, is to help translate the strategic plan into actionable goals, set targets that we can measure progress against, whether their metrics or, or other sort of verbal goals that we're looking at. And part of the job is to help identify resources to fund the goals. And like I said, I'm fortunate to work very collaboratively, collaboratively with everyone here and also with the senior leadership team. >> I'm fortunate to have inherited a wonderful team, IR Team. When I got here, John Sawyer leads that team, really committed people. >> I came in like a whirlwind and was asking about all their their processes. >> And and John was very patient with me in helping develop new reports and identify new metrics. >> And we're gonna work harder to collect more information to be able to report on things so that we can help make decisions based on data. Although Day is not the only thing, it helps as a grounding mechanism. And data only works if it's against our peers because we are always judged against our peer institutions. >> So I think that's it. >> I'm very grateful to be here. >> Thank you. Either try it again. It's in the order that is order of standing, kind of like the way you are stacked up against the wall there. So be theocratic. Was Interim Vice President for boy, you have a really interesting guy. Facilities, real estate, real estate and auxiliary services. >> Three is going to tell us what you do. >> Alright. >> Good afternoon everyone. Pleasure to be here. President size said, my name is Peter crowd. Check facilities real estate auxiliary services is an organization of about 600 people. >> We have a large variety of tasks. >> So we're responsible for maintenance and operations, which always includes fixing things, making sure we have lights heeding those sorts of things. Planning and project delivery, which is all the capital and renovation projects that you see on the campus. At one time, custodial services, moving services, mail services, THE bookstore, Dining Services, Conference Services, real estate, parking, and transportation, which I didn't want to mention because I know what Parking means on a college campus. So you can see it's a very diversify organization for the campus. It's also one that touches nearly every person on the campus. My staff, we work with students very closely in terms of the, the residence halls. We'll work with all of you in multiple ways and our goal is to support everything that you do in those ways. Sometimes if the support is intentionally very, very quiet, like for example, when you came in this room, you didn't have to think about that. The lights were on and other ways. We want our support to be very, very helpful and direct with you if you're planning a new building or via that idea for some improvement to campus, we want to work one-on-one with you. So we're very, very proud. I'm I person. I'm very, very proud to represent the people that I work with. I was just one part of the organization at the beginning and now that I oversee everything, I'm I'm so happy that all of you have the the kind of people that I know on a day-to-day basis supporting you left that we that that one title and university architect forgot them. Which means I can't say when the thanks, sorry. So the global initiative, one of the goals that presses size gave. I'm still waiting, waiting for six years for one of you to please start an Institute in Paris. So actually inspect the building. Okay, so that's your challenge as I leave this podium. >> Thank you. >> And I should say that B is the person. If you have a leak in your office, your lab, need an umbrella while you're lecturing or something. You know, he's the man who's going to but I already dies. They have $500 million of deferred maintenance and give us recommendations how to make it dinged by maybe spending 25 million Year over the next 20 years. Now, that's assuming nothing else breaks down during those 20 years because that, you know, it will be added to the list. Also, Peter, he's working very closely with Alan Bryman, whoever appointed as the permanent executive vice president number of, you know, Island. He was already the interim vice president, executive vice president when I came. Unfortunately, he has some eye surgery today, so he couldn't be with us. He he's going to come back with me another time. One of the areas where I'm working very closely with Harlan and Peter and the medical and the deans in terms of the vision, evolving vision for R star campus, That's a great opportunity for us. As you know, the Watson, the greener kind of gone. There is one left. But we obviously have a great opportunity for our University to expand in the future and truly deliver our missions on the star campus. I do not see this dark, obviously real estate play. I do see as an opportunity for the entire university, all areas or disciplines to meet the world. So again, please work with us and join forces. And that the next person is Glenn Carter. Glenn has joined us as the Vice President for Communications and Marketing from the non-academic world. Used to be at 3M for 17 years. And the little discovered length. >> Hello everyone. >> It's a pleasure to be here. I came to you this fall, as Dennis said. So been very excited to be here, lead the Office of Communications and Marketing. And the charge of my department is really bringing the UD experience to life through storytelling and compelling content. And I have to say, I really enjoyed meeting several faculty and the opportunities that we've had to not only work with faculty a story features, but also storytellers. And so I really look forward to continuing that. We had a lot of success during the inauguration working with two-minute goes office on the inauguration symposium. And it was a great opportunity to see all the exciting work that our faculty is contributing. And I'm just looking forward to more opportunities to do that. Not only outside in what I thought, what I would consider story in content generating, but also bringing people, or excuse me, not only inside out but outside and as well as bring, bringing people, I always say to Dennis, bring you to the world and the world to Udi. And we've had opportunities to do that with outside organizations that are taking more and more interest in our faculty. So thank you for having us here today. >> Christy re re-work is athletics director. Chris has been very busy as you know, help us many things including brain one championship field hockey. At the same time, we have a number of coaches and hope that other teams to winning prison. >> Thank you, President Santos. Good afternoon everyone. Nice to see everybody. I joined this university in May. I had the opportunity to grow up right outside of Philadelphia, but spent about 28 years in the Midwest. So it's nice to be back home. Most recently at the University of Michigan. I had the honor of serving you all and many of our faculty and staff and students into specific roles. One, the recreation services area, where we have over 22 thousand people that walk into the little bob. We within that, the student population, we have 37 club sports, 1600 students, about 6 thousand students that participate in inter murals. And about 84% of the total student population walks into the little bob and utilizes all the resources. >> So it is a very, very important job. >> By I see a lot of partnerships. We work with Dawn and her team on the overall health and well-being of our students. And then on the other side, which is equally as important, is the opportunity that I have to serve the university as the athletic director in representing our 650 student athletes, which is 21 teams, varsity teams. As Dennis mentioned, we had some great success this past year on the field with our field hockey team winning a division one field hockey national title, which was a pretty exciting opportunity for our students. We also are working towards, and obviously great success, I believe, in winning in the classroom, in the community, and on the fields. Some of you may realize that our student athletes in this last semester had a record breaking year, or excuse me, record breaking semester over 3.1 GPA for 650 of our student athletes. So it was wonderful. They I didn't do any of that. I always feel very lucky to be honest, who walk into the situation where the students, student athletes really are very, very serious about being students first. And I owe that all of you a great deal of gratitude for the support that you provide to them to be able to compete in their sports while also being able to compete in the classrooms. >> And I know they appreciate that they take that very, very seriously. >> They all recognize that what they're really doing is they're enjoying four wonderful years, but they're really preparing themselves for the next 40 years. We take that opportunity seriously. So I'm excited. I've had the opportunity to meet with many deans to talk about the wonderful partnerships that are available within athletics around interdisciplinary work for our students and our student athletes. And I'm looking forward to continuing those conversations. So thanks again for allowing me to be here with us. >> This has been our deputy for research and scholarship. Was one of the Coleridge or strategic blow shy would have done it if you just want to resize innovation. So vice-president research scholarship. >> So the, the oldest new face here, 20th year at the University of Delaware. It's a great pleasure to be here. As, as Dennis mentioned, one of the changes now is an additional focus on innovation and entrepreneurship. And so in the research office, which many of you know well, we have historically focused on activities that allow our faculty, staff, and students to engage more effectively with federal funding agencies as well as state non-profits and the private sector. >> And increasingly, there are additional opportunities to leverage >> Those resources to more effectively do the work of the faculty. So our role really is to facilitate, not to regulate, as we'd like to say. Although, you know, in the world of research, compliance, and regulatory affairs, it's sometimes a challenge to run that line between advocating for and trying to hold back the various regulatory requirements that come our way with increasing frequency. So the role really is to facilitate, as Dennis mentioned, some new alignments are underway. So importantly, the Office of Economic Innovation and partnerships is now aligned with the research office. So we're going to work more effectively, I know, together to facilitate the work of our faculty, staff, and students to translate their discoveries and their ideas into commercialized products. >> And I'll, I'll be back in a few minutes. >> As preside has invited me to tell you a little bit more about one of those activities in terms of Manufacturing USA. So it's a pleasure to be here. Always a pleasure to be a member of the faculty. >> This background vice president for development and alumni relations, before saying We need to donors and getting back. So this is the person who will help us make adams. >> Yeah, everybody. Beth brand. I'm probably the second newest, oldest person on the team. I've been with the university for nine years and I'm also an alum, graduated class of 95. I'm happy to be here today to see all of you. >> I see many familiar faces that have played a role in our philanthropic success over the years. >> I'm bright now, working very diligently with the team to build and plan the next comprehensive campaign that we've been planning and building for many years, but now will be the right time to launch, launch it. And in the fall, hopefully look forward to working with all of you and the new senior leadership team. Thanks. >> And in the spirit of completeness, i should also introduce Jeff Garland. He's continuing as a secretary and vice president. Jeff, please done so people can recognize you're so here's Jeff Thompson, Vice-President for Student Life. >> Dawn greets, NEW senior vice president for enrollment, medical graphs for our provost is you're worried about the Senate agenda. >> I have this all planned. >> We have Consent Agenda and five resolutions. >> If they're not too controversial, it'll get then by 05:30 PM, which is my plan. >> I I'm I'm sure I was thinking about looking at the clock and I think we can give you five minutes to answer. >> Jon Bernstein, history. I live right near Rodney. >> Does that tell you what my question is? >> What's going to happen to Rodney, door and **** themselves? This is why I have a great team and p2 p3, where we're currently trying to negotiate the sale. >> Well, those properties, we're working with the city of New York closely and we're just in the middle of negotiations that some time ago, it was that same plan that the city will buy it. >> I can't say, but I do know, I think that not only because I literally can't say, but I don't, I don't want to mislead unity. We don't get that part of those parties. >> Alan Bregman leaves that effort. >> Unfortunately, you start your day. >> She'd be able to answer your question, but not a rove solu I think that's what was that? >> Maybe Johnson from nursing. And I have a really good question for you. >> You talked about all the development in the moneys that need to go places. When will that faculty have a contract? >> I've been here 21 years and I've never worked without a contract until this test July floorboard. >> It's frustrating because we then coming off of 1% raises for the last 34 years. >> So I appreciate the question and I think it has happened at least once more. When Russell was first appointed president, resigned, wasn't here. Yeah, yeah. So it's exactly actually at that time, the church was little wars, to my knowledge, extended the whole spring semester. We we are making, I believe a good progress and we just had a great conversation with the elites, might consider Vic and myself, and we hope will reach closure by the end of this month. But there's nothing more I can say because I'm not a direct negotiator, right? I'm just hoping that where priority is and I hope that we can get it. The self there is soon because if anything, the economic climate is worsening. >> So I'd love to see the behind us. >> And of course, you know, from day one, my, my January no further, which is keep everything we have for everybody we have exactly the same way we have it. >> Okay, well, my agenda from day one was equal pay for equal work, but it's never happened. >> Side rear of the same self. >> And they've got it. Yeah, yes. Danny. Galileo from biological sciences. >> Thank you for coming and speaking with us and taking questions. President Assad has you did not mention what I believe you mentioned originally in September, if I'm not incorrect, was increasing the faculty by about 250 over the next five years over and above retirement. So that would average out to about 50 new over and above the above worthy that retire every year. >> And even back then, it seemed like that was going to be very challenging, even if the political climate stayed the status quo. But now that it isn't status quo and everything is very uncertain, including >> Funding for research, which presumably these people will be going towards the research mission of the university. So they be expected to get federal grants. Have you reconsider this plan for that number of faculty? Thank you for the excellent question. And I did not mention it only because I forgot there is no hidden agenda here. I'm still committed to increasing the size of our faculty body net. New, you know, whether we can do to 50 or not remains to be seen. Even at that time, I don't even remember me saying directly to 50 as a perhaps that that number in some of the interviews, but that's beyond the point. I would love to see us increase it about 50 a year. Net new. It will depend on a number of factors. The first factor, of course, is our state appropriation. So if you know this data preparation changes dramatically, five or 10%, we won't be able to grow at that rate. There's no doubt about that. Second is the potential to increase our enrollment. We have talked about looking at increasing our graduate enrollment, said that openly up to doubling our graduate enrollment over the next five to ten years. Some of that would be at the master's level, which should be revenue-generating and we intend to give that to the units that generated through some correction in our budget model. So that's one part. The other piece of it. As the undergraduate leather. We we absolutely want to see what is or through limits to enrollment capacity. We don't want to change the character of the institution because we love the way it is. But I think on the order of 1000 students, increase in undergraduate enrollment is entirely feasible, particularly if you look at all our campuses nor facilities that have to happen only New York. Perhaps some can happen in Lewis and other locations where it's badly needed. We also have the possibility of having students go abroad at about an equal rate as new students would be coming here. So we could have study abroad throughout the year, not just focused on winter. Online education is another potential revenue enhancer, philanthropy. We're about to launch a campaign sometime next fall, I hope so that could be another enhancer to help us. The last lever that we are looking at through the help of Institutional Research and competitive benchmarking as differential tuition or fees. Basically being able to charge the appropriate tuition depending on the major you're studying. You know, that's something that I would say 19 out of 25 of our competitors do as differential tuition. And the rest who don't quite call it differential tuition, call it fees for certain discipline. So there's a number of levers and I remain committed to increasing our faculty body. And again, I thank you very much for your question. >> It could possibly have. One last question. If there's none though, robot as being non. >> Thank you very much to me and all the members of the team at the conclusion of this. >> And you don't have to rush, I'll be waiting at my house, you know, at the end of it, it's our house. So please come and we'll have a great hospitality for the next item on the agenda. Remarks but robots dress. >> Thank you. >> Preside. I know that you have limited time here and I will be as quick as I can be. >> But I do have a few items that I'd like to discuss with you. >> As you know, there has been a lot of a lot of, as Lori mentioned, executive orders in Washington that have gone flip-flop back and forth and we're not really sure where things stand, but we do know that this is causing some stress among groups of students and scholars on campus. So tomorrow at the Morris library, we're going to be hosting a forum on some of these executive orders that regard that relate to immigration. They're going to be two sessions. The first session going to be an informational session for international students and scholars. There'll be held from 1130 to 1230 in a class of 1941 lecture room. And then session two is going to be an academic forum on the orders that is scheduled between 1230 and it will feature UD faculty members that have expertise in political science formulations and political communication. I would encourage you to attend. There will be another forum in a couple of weeks, or actually next week, entitled What, what happens now? And actually I think that that's a song from a, from a vita as well, just as a point of reference. And this event is going to be from four to six PM on Monday, February 13th and authority Hall and will feature a panel of UD experts to address the issue of who is most vulnerable to these particular executive orders. And finally, around communication. The communication is preparing, is about to release this month a brochure on dual career candidates that will help you hopefully recruit dual career candidates. And that will be available both in hard copy and online. With regard to international students, you may be wondering how many we have here on campus. We have 3,188 international students representing 98 different countries. And o ISS, the offs of international students and scholars, is doing a wonderful job of working with our students in light of what is transpiring in Washington. They've set up a specific website that provides updates and guidance on the executive order. They'd have counseling sessions. And I want to thank Ravi homage and for all his great work. And this is Ravi here. He's not here. But I really want to thank because As President scientists mentioned. I'd like to just give you a quick update on our graduate college. We established a working group last fall and it is under the direction of and artists. And it's been meeting weekly and then President as scientists. And I met with them at the launch of their working effort. And during this meeting, President scientists put the challenge on the table that we have to take our graduate efforts to the next level, potentially doubling our graduate enrollment over the next several years. And artist has been doing a lot of work around this. We've commissioned a report from the Hanover group looking at graduate benchmarking study. And we receive benchmarking data from 39 R1 institutions to look at how they do graduate education. We're also retaining the service of the Council of graduate schools. And they will be sending a team of three individuals from three different institutions were still working that out for three days to give us advice on graduate, undergraduate school or graduate college constitution. And there will be a series of report out meetings after this during the semester and and stakeholder meetings as well. As President sign has said, we have to date a record number of applications over 27 thousand. And we I have to thank Chris Lu Sierra and his team for getting notifications out as early as they have is the earliest we've ever gotten them out. And because of change in nasa, we've been able to give full financial aid packages a month earlier than we typically do. So students are going to be able to make their decisions early on. And I think that this is going to make us much more competitive in terms of retaining the best students that have applied here. And the our first decision day is February 18th. I would encourage you and your colleagues to participate and help us attract these students to campus. With regard to promotion and tenure, MacKenzie avec is leading the commission on promotion and tenure standards. He's their group is going to mark that. >> Oh, I'm sorry. >> I'm sorry. And Martha? Martha, Yes. It's a joint effort. And of course and they're going to release the report at the end of the semester, before the end of the semester. And they're going to have listening sessions or tenured and tenure track faculty members that and they'll have one session each for assistant, associate, and full professors. And I really apologize, Martha, as, as I was coming over here, I was thinking again about all the great efforts that we've done together since I've arrived here. And I have yet another ask of you to work together with the provost's office. And it relates to North Carolina House bill number two. As many of you know, there have been many states that have banned travel to North Carolina to include California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New York, Vermont, in Washington. And many other states are considering banning this. And they are banning the use of state funds to travel to North Carolina, which includes their state universities. I would like to going to work with preside and the executive committee. The senate to try to put together a group of faculty members to help advise the president, the provost, as to what we should do with regard to the use of university dollars in sponsoring travel to the state of North Carolina. This is important because our athletic teams are faced with this challenge. As you may know, the NCA has pulled all their championships out of North Carolina. The MBA has pulled there All Star game out of North Carolina. This is something that we have to grapple with and decide what we want to do with state funds. This does not restrict you in the use of any type of discretionary funds you might have, whether it's grant money or if it's research money, or if an institution in North Carolina, Duke invite you down for a lecture or you want to travel personally. This is entirely, oop, sorry, this is, this is entirely up to you. But we would like your advice as to what we should do with university dollar in terms of sponsoring traveled to North Carolina. We we it would certainly not be right for us to tell her athletic teams not to travel to North Carolina and expose our students to this, to this restriction and have our faculty traveling there on state, on state dollars. So we, we ask your advice as to what we should do again, in the spirit of collaboration, that ends my remarks. I have to leave right after this because I have to speak at the Delaware teachers Institute. So I won't be able to stay for the rest of the meeting, but I would be happy to answer any questions before I go. >> Yes. >> Present since I don't have a question for Provost Bras. So I'd like to ask you if you would consider recognizing former senator more. And I'll be real, real quick, three points I'll just run through and maybe they need to be thought about. >> Rather the dancers, I would hope that if there is going to be a gradually College established, especially in an era of tight budgets, that it will not lead to an increase in the number of administrators and start getting into turf wars with each other that I've heard about at some institutions, including the University of Michigan, Also on the issue of the disparity in the grant four-year graduation rate between male and female students. >> I think it would be good to know whether that's a local Delaware issue or if it's a more general national issue. And we should also look at the graduation rates and comparable flagship universities, starting with, say, Marilynne, Penn State Virginia, and so on. And finally, on the issue of whether state funds should be used to travel to North Carolina, given that the state money is appropriated by the legislature, I think you should certainly include the legislature in finding out what their ideas are. >> So let me just address that last point, Josh. I did not say state dollars. I said university dollars. So it's the use of university dollars. Whether whatever the origin is, it's our general fund dollars is my question. >> I thought you said we were free to use other dollars >> You know, those are good comments and thank you. >> Thank you. Okay. Thank you. >> The interests of time, I do not have any announcement other than to say that Charlie read and we're going to speak about rapid MPA. >> Thanks very much. Facade. So I just want to take a couple of minutes and highlight these new awards that you've heard a little bit about and are probably curious about what they're all about in greater detail and what their impact really can be and will be for the university, for the state, and for the region. So at a time later in the semester, I have asked the leaders of these two initiatives to hold it an open session where we can have more time for a deeper dive into these projects and the implication for our faculty, staff, and students. But today I just wanted to give you a high-level overview regarding what these funding profiles look like and what their genesis really is. So if you look at the top of this plot, you will see something that's referred to as the TRL or technology readiness level. So moving from left to right, you move really from basic discovery to launching into a commercialization. And on the left hand side, the blue distribution is government and youth, or c, funding for early stage work and discoveries. The ladder, and you can see with a higher profile in a general sense, is private, private sector investment towards commercialization. So there's a gap in the middle that's indicated there in the plot that's often referred to as the Valley of Death, as one goes from basic discovery to commercialization. And it's called that because funding that transitional phase has historically been very challenging. This is a topic that the most recent federal administration that as the Obama Administration identified with Congress a number of years ago. And so four years ago, through legislation, there were federal investments design to really address that valley of death in very profound ways to help take discoveries, basic discoveries, whether they come from universities or come from private sector startups, et cetera, and move them towards commercialization effectively. And the result of that legislation is what's now referred to as Manufacturing USA. And so you can see the language on the bottom of this slide are these public-private partnerships that have been launched, seeded with federal investments. And really their goals are to seed Innovation, Commercialization, education, and collaboration. So lots of the conversation that you hear and read with respect to manufacturing, this is really focused on what I would argue is 21st century manufacturing. This is not about taking manufacturing of the 20th century and figuring out either how to reassure it or to head in the opposite direction of Innovation and progress with respect to driving those technologies, but really to develop what is going to be the new economies and have these be centered in the United States. So what the federal government did was invest in these institutes. And you'll see a little bit more about these in brief. Each one of these institutes isn't a different technology sector. So the two that we'll talk about today are in biopharmaceutical manufacturing and chemical process intensification, because those are the two that the University of Delaware has significant roles in. But across the country, you can see each one of these stars indicates where one of these different technology sector institutes is lead from. So you can see a cup on the West Coast and a number focused on in the eastern half, the east of the Mississippi. And the names and the acronyms around indicate the various programs that have been launched. So they include everything from new semiconductor materials, composites for lightweight manufacturing, flexible electronics, robotics. The most recent one named even after the UD announcements in late December, is in biomaterials and regenerative medicine, suddenly out of New Hampshire. But the two I want to focus today as President of scientists that go by the acronyms of rapid and nimble. So first is nimble, which stands for the National Institute for innovation in manufacturing biopharmaceuticals. This is an institute that will be housed and centered in New York, Delaware. The lead PI and the individual responsible for bringing together this proposal is Kelvin way. Kelvin couldn't be here today because he's out interviewing candidates for various physicians as nimble as being launched. So biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Biopharmaceuticals are, relatively speaking, a new generation of drugs. So rather than preparing drugs that we're all familiar with using chemical methods, biopharmaceutical uses biology to generate these new molecules which are necessarily more complex in their structure. They hold the potential and the promise to be more directed and targeting the diseases or the conditions that they are targeting. Gene therapies and cell therapies included among these, you hear about topics like precision medicine as an aside, really should be accurate medicine as an outside jokes. Those Know the difference between precision and accuracy are personalized medicine. There are great opportunities here, but it turns out there are great challenges in the preparation and manufacturing of these new materials somewhere in its infancy in terms of our understanding of how to innovate in this space. So the proposal that Kelvin lead, which resulted in a team of a 150 different institutional partners going in with a proposal that was more than 1500 pages and length to the National Institutes of Standards and Technology result and resulted in the winning team. And so you can see on this slide a number of the areas that nimble will be impacting on the early side. And then in terms of the nimble focus areas. And then on the outside, I want you to just focus on some of the impact. So this is really about innovating in the development of new pharmaceuticals to impact society, to impact healthcare delivery, and to create new jobs and new economy. So all of these institutes have multiple components to them. There's certainly an R and D component. No question. R&d both in this context with respect to the drugs, but also R and D in the context of innovating in the manufacturing space. We do not know how to manufacture as a society or as a research community and a wide-scale sense these new types of drugs, these biopharmaceuticals. So they're great implications. There are regulatory implications as you know well. So the federal, the FDA is going to be a unique and important partner in this effort. Some of these memberships include, as I'll show you in the next slide. Now these are some of the various institutions that Kelvin and his team have brought together in the early stages of proposal development. So it really is a national network. It's going to be structured so that as you can see here, there are at the bottom five nodal regions, the mid-Atlantic being the headquarters. So nimble will launch initially out of the Delaware Biotechnology Institute here in New York, Delaware. Importantly, all of these institutes are focused on seeding of federal investments over five years. The total federal investment in this institute nationally, of which 25 states are participating, is $70 million. The expected minimum cost share from partners is a one-to-one cost share. So do even submit a proposal for this competition. You needed to degenerate and document $70 million over five years. And cost-share, as you can see, the ultimate cost share here was more on the order of a 129 million getting up to 200 million total. And I think what that really reflects is this is the right time to be investing in innovation, biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Because the big pharma companies, the small medium enterprises, the supply chains, all realise that there are common problems that they to address that can be only addressed in a precompetitive way with funding between and among the various entities. I've often said, and I honestly believe this, or more than 7 billion people on the planet yet, I'm not sure there's anyone else besides Kelvin Lee who could have pulled this team together in this way to launch this institute. So Kelvin deserves a tremendous amount of credit providing the faculty leadership for this. And as you probably know and have heard, because this is going to involve so much of Kelvins time, he's stepping away from his directorship at the DOE or Biotechnology Institute. And he's now the, the institute director for nimble. And then the second program I wanted to draw your attention to, which is funded by the Department of Energy, is a so-called rapid Program, rapid advancement of process intensification, deployment, rapid easier for easy NIS of articulation. And this is led by two individuals with deep connections to the University of Delaware. On the right hand side is Dionne Vlassa OS, who is a Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and recently has been appointed the Director of the University of Delaware Energy Institute Indians here. And I want the end to raise his hand and take a bow for all of his in this. So in this activity, another individual with deep Delaware roots and connections is carried Fletcher, the woman nonetheless to karen, spent much of her career up until about a year ago in the variety of leadership positions The DuPont company here. Locally, she has to University of Delaware degrees, both the bachelors, masters degrees in chemical engineering. And in the last year she has taken on a role with the American institute of chemical engineers. And specifically in that role, she serving as the CEO, the chief executive officer for rapid. So Karen continues to live in delaware. She goes she commutes several days a week up to New York City where I CHE is located. I'm she also has office space, a nice lab to allow her to collaborate more closely with the efforts of Dione and his team. In rapid, you can see some of the broad impacts to the chemical industry. The rapid hopes to achieve the funding mechanism is similar. So this time there's $70 million over five years directly coming from the department of energy in this case, and matching dollars to the tune of about $200 million from industry. And broadly speaking, what rapid aims to achieve is like biopharmaceutical manufacturing or rather audacious goal. And it's really designed to re-envision how manufacturing in the chemical industry takes place in the 21st century with an eye toward energy efficiency, water use efficiency, the other aspects as you can see. And so the role that the University of Delaware is plane in this effort. Aic h0 out of New York City is leading, but University of Delaware has a very important role here leading the catalysis in reaction engineering thrust. So now I know I've spoken too long. So within this thrust for leveraging expertise that we have at the university in research, in education and catalysis and reaction engineering more broadly. At brew. These efforts, what Dion and his team will ultimately be able to do is reduce manufacturing footprint for the chemical industry. So if you want to have it have a visual to think about in this context. If you think about oil refining is that's been practiced in the 20th century. Think about going out to success perhaps in the Midwest or Alaska, Canada that think about an oil rig and extracting crew or gas from the ground. And then an entire infrastructure has been built around that for the better part of the center, right? So we extract the raw materials are transported sometimes across the country, sometimes through pipelines that you may have heard about to sites where the where the products or refine split out into its various components. Those individual components then are manufactured and processed into the various products. Whether it's fuel for your, for your automobile, diesel fuel, whether it's monomers that are converted the polymers to generate plastics and other materials, et cetera. So imagine now taking that very disperse and diffuse infrastructure and modularizing it. Such top of that, well had you can put a modularization unit that will do all of that processing at one site. Think about the reduced footprint for water use, energy input, transportation, environmental impact, cost, and ultimately quality of the product that's delivered. So what's really exciting about these are, these are two faculty led initiatives that are really going to dramatically Transform our society and really continue to invest in manufacturing in the United States. So the question that's always asked and I'll answer it upfront. There's been a lot of talk, of course, about what the future holds, particularly Washington DC with, with the change in administration, workforce development, manufacturing, United States jobs. This is a program that I think will transcend the change in administration, and we hope that that's the case. So again, Kelvin and Dionne deserve all the credit for leading these two efforts. And you'll hear a lot more about them in the weeks and months ahead. >> See, my Mac would work. >> Okay. You always have to be prepared for such eventualities. The next item on the agenda is the consent agenda. And there are 24 recommendations. And in order to help, you have summarized them here. They're revisions to various majors and minors. And you tend, tend more. And since my Mac does not have the clicker software, we're going to use the yellow cards. Thankfully, we still have them. And so is there a motion to I guess we is there does anyone want to pull out any item from the consent agenda? Then we shall have a vote on the consent agenda. All those in favor, please raise the yellow cards. >> Parliamentarian, either way. >> Okay. Anyone anyone anyone opposed anyone abstaining? Ok. The motion passes. The Consent Agenda passes unanimously. The next item is the regular agenda. You have no unfinished business and under new business, we got five resolutions. Let me start with the first one. I thought I'd provide some context. There was a APR committee which had not met for a few years. And the current APR committee consists of six Past President. The current President and the President Elect during this fall semester, a group of past presidents have met informally with me and the exact committee in formal Council of Elders and the oh, sorry. It's so so in November, we introduce a senate resolution to reactivate the APR committee with a different name. And it was sent back to committee because we would send that. Galileo told us that we should also change the charged, not just the name. So revise charger name was approved by Coke and the Rules Committee and the Executive Committee, and that is revised resolution is present. Then next, So it comes moved and seconded by the rules committee, the Executive Committee, and the and cocaine. Michael cape. You have mechanical engineering attachment one n says that committee will meet at least once a month at 12 times a year. So I'd like to suggest that maybe was one. It was maybe once a month during the semester and then once in the summer, the friendly adjustment. So since you had mentioned this ahead of time, this was considered guess we ran it through the cocaine and rules committee and and period are buoyant, only wanted from us. And this was spearheaded by the by the cocaine rules and exact and that change whether k If this abandoned except evolved than any further discussions thing. >> So remember you're going to vote on the amendment just to pass by a simple majority in instances would go into the faculty handbook. >> It has to pass by two-thirds. So we will start by voting on the amendment that senate Keef I suggested. So I guess I needed so I can put that amendment factor. Okay, all those in favor of the amendment? Alright, so the amendment passes. Now we shall vote. >> Cooking. >> Sorry, All those opposed anyone abstaining? Ok. I'm taking these things for granted, but I've got right. And now that the amendment at the throat, and it's as shown here, we would Is there a discussion on the amended resolution? Okay. There's none. Then this is going to be a bylaw chain. So we need two-thirds of the vote. And did you want to say something? So all those in favor of this resolution, Okay. So we have 505150 and all those opposed any abstentions? Abstention. So the motion passes. 5101. Okay. The next item on the agenda is resolution permanent approval of the MS and disaster management. I guess I saw but Sonic I chair of studies over here, would you like to make any comments about the communities comfortable with this Masters program? >> And then the next one will be a PhD program. They're graduating students. I think they had only come out of this and they're all getting employment or this program going onto other academic degrees. >> So seems to be on what they said they're going to do much and gone moved and seconded by the guide Committee and the Executive Committee and the coordinating committee on education is their discussion. Okay. Seeing none, all those in favor. >> Ok. All those opposed. >> Any abstentions? Motion passes the unanimous mural ketosis. Normally, I promise vitality so you can live. Resolution, the third resolution I think up Chair of grad studies, but Sonic already mentioned this. So is there any discussion here? Okay, seeing none, all those in favor of the resolution ALL opposed. Anyone opposed any abstentions. Okay. This motion baskets unanimous. Then we have the fourth resolution which is for a masters in data hip disability services. But you wanted to say something about it? Yep. >> So this proposal was put together very nicely and say another interdisciplinary program, I think one of their stats was about one in five Americans has some kind of disability. So this program boys train leaders of different kinds of organizations, but as government agencies, profit, non-profit organizations with different skills to, to run those groups. And they had some nice data in there. The census data was included. Some pretty interesting program. >> Is there any discussion? >> Might be mechanical engineering, computation. >> How long is the Google? >> This one is the Master's program. >> Master's says five years. >> I just anybody. Okay. Seeing none all those in favor of this resolution. Unanimous, but let me check. Anyone opposed any abstention? Ok. The motion passes unanimously. And then we have the last resolution which is which comes from the promotion and tenure committee and approved by the executive committee. So that's the chair of the promotion and tenure committee, Maryanne McLain, to say something about this. >> This was meant to address a one session section in 4.1.6 that's talking about how frequently should faculty BE evaluated. >> And in the, in this, in the current for 0.1.6, it was directing individuals to look at a different a different section that was actually speaking more about tenure track. In other words, every two years, which goes with the two and four-year evaluation that normally happens for somebody on tenure track. >> So to to make it clearer, we suggested that once when he gets to the the rolling five-year time point in their career as a continuing track faculty member, that the evaluation happens every five years. >> Okay. Here's attachment one with the change required as a result of this then he discussion. Okay. Seeing none all those in favor or not just new? >> Yep. >> All those in favor of the resolution anonymous. But let me check if there anyone opposed any extension for k. The motion passes unanimously. So the last item is and introduction of new business. Then you new business being introduced fairly. >> Bonds. Do not really know Business necessarily, but just a comment and a suggestion. >> I've been involved in a center for approximately 2.5 decades on and off. And we've always men in this room. >> May I suggest that the Senate has outgrown this room and we'd have 0.2 dozen people standing during much of the meeting. And that the Senate look to find a larger room where we can hold our meetings. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Any other comments? >> Okay. Seeing none, is there a motion to agenda? And excuse me for going to a minutes or whether from inside
2016-2017/09Faculty Senate Meeting Feb 6 2017.mp4
From Joseph Dombroski May 06, 2020
0 plays
0
0 comments
0
You unliked the media.