Okay. Why don't we get started? Welcome to the February seventh, 2011 meeting of the university faculty senate. The first item on our agenda is the adoption of the agenda. The agenda comes to you moved and seconded from the executive committee. Is there any discussion on the agenda here? No discussion. All those in favor of adopting the agenda, please say aye. >> Opposed. >> Okay. Thank you. So we have adopted the agenda next time. Our agenda is the approval of the minutes of December 62010 Faculty Senate meeting. These minutes have been reviewed by the executive committee and come to you. Moved and seconded. Is there any discussion or corrections to the minutes of December 62,010 meeting? >> Yes. John, I saw it. The very answer were a couple of places where it said the motion passed and spouted PST changed after that version. >> And any have any other questions? >> All those in favor of the approval of the minutes, changing the spelling of path asked me said I oppose, so we have approval of that rule and minutes. >> Next on agenda remarks from Provost Apple. >> Thank you, John, and I will be brief. You're probably used to me getting up here and talking about academic rigor. And I promised I would say that every time in the, in the realm of increased writing and oral communication and visual communication. >> And also thinking about how we evaluate our faculty in terms of teaching. >> But interestingly, I was talking to Susan parenthesis and I see you in the audience about academic rigor. >> And she mentioned how of course, one of the, maybe the heart and soul of the campuses, the campus library. >> And Susan was kind enough to send me some data on library usage, which I think is probably, if not linear in student effort and time on task, which leads to student learning at least has a strong correlation. And Susan sent me some numbers that are pretty astounding. And this is a good news message I want to give you. >> I'm actually quite astonished. There's a 30% increase in the number of individuals entering the library compared to four years ago. Some of these have two-year and some have four-year differences that have been measured. 69% increase in use of one of our journal databases, 48% percent increase in the other one. These are the Gayle and PepsiCo databases, a 17% increase in items checked out over the last four years, and the 19% increase in the number of students using the library at the new late night hours until two in the morning. >> So kudos to the faculty, I think we're making our students work harder, which is something I really wanted to see. >> So this is sort of a celebration of that. And thank you, Susan, for providing that information to me. >> It makes me feel good that we are moving in the right directions as far as academic rigor. You may also be interested in knowing that this week we do have are generalist examiners from the middle states commission on higher education visiting the campus and doing a document review to look at our Middle States accreditation on the 14 standards. >> So that's happening as well. >> I don't want to take up too much time because I know my colleague Mark Bartov is going to talk to you about a number of areas around Chrysler and research. >> So with that, can I take any questions from anyone? Yes. Thanks. This question did come up in English during the winter and it's, it's, if you know about this man and we have the delayed opening. >> The delayed opening tended to be a tan and people ask questions about the 945 classes, which the website says there's places are washed away. >> You're shaking your head. So you know, I know about this. It's Peggy. >> Botswana has done some great work with a registrar there now in the loop to make sure that we're going to have a closing. >> We make it so the most convenient, given the faculty start times we'd have. So that was raised by a faculty member sent me an email. >> I actually don't know the faculty member, but I got an email from him, I believe it was, and send it on to the registrar and they're all top. >> Thank you. Thank you. Yes. They're just another good point that was brought up by a faculty member. Someone asked the question, do we even need to have 08:00 AM classes in the winter at all, given that we know that there's Gei, Could we fit all the class exam to a shorter guy? So we're investigating that as one jump. Thanks, Tom. I'm it's really good to hear about the increased usage of the library, especially late at night on, on weekdays, Sunday through Thursday, when the library's open until two in the morning. Back about 20 years ago, back during the 19 eighties, the library was always open until 10:00 PM at night on Friday and Saturday nights. And it was the hours were reduced to have closing at eight PM on those nights as a result of the tight budget situation in 1991. And I'm wondering if it would be a good idea for us to find the resources to keep the library open at least until 10:00 PM on Friday and Saturday nights. So those students of ours who really do want to study at those times can conveniently do so. >> All pass that along, susan, for consideration and we'll have a discussion with that. >> Thank you, sir. I would also like to suggest that maybe the library should not be closed the day before semester begins. Semester began yesterday or today. And yesterday was supposed you know, there are there are situations in which last-minute chunking of references, but then you would have a number of things is useful. >> I would think that we will want to keep the library open. Well, thank you. Thank you. >> Under announcements, I'll have a series of announcements to update you on progress or lack thereof that the Executive Committee has made in the last month and a half. But first, I'd like to have we have a guest guest speaker, Dr. Mark Barto. Mark is the Senior Vice Provost for Research and strategic initiatives. And we'll be talking to us a little bit about the science and technology campus. >> Yes. >> Well, thanks. I appreciate the chance to come talk to the Senate about the science and technology campus. It's only been 14 months since the university acquired the Chrysler site. And I would say in the last 12 months, we've had a number of discussions with all kinds of people from our congressional delegation, staffers, state officials, federal agency representatives, potential national lab partners, for profit, non-profit partners, federal agency representatives, external advisory committees of our institutes and centers and so forth. And so what I have today are, are a collection of slides that have been evolving over that time. And I guess the way I would put it is that we've got our story straight enough now that we're ready to tell it a little more widely. But, but recognize that the situation is fluid. The plans continue to evolve. And what I want to do is to try to give you the flavor of what we're working on and how it fits in with many of the initiatives on campus. So that's why I've called this Envisioning the Science and Technology campus. And that vision will take a while to realize and it will evolve. But I think that the greater the awareness across the campus of what we're trying to accomplish, the better. I actually wanted to start with a few slides that pre-date this to really show you starting with the path to prominence and in particular the emphasis on research and graduate education. And the emphasis on becoming a national, excuse me, trying to sneeze into the microphone. A national and international resource for environmental research and technology and education. That we're doing things on the campus that are, are pushing those forward. And the opportunity to develop the, shall we say, the site formerly known as Chrysler, will give us an opportunity to leverage some of those things. Even more. Just wanted to remind you of some of the key interdisciplinary areas that were called out on the path to prominence, including the Life Sciences, energy, and the environment. And those are ones in which we now have established institutes. Of course, DBI goes back to 1999, the University of Delaware and Energy Institute is only a couple of years old, but building on 40 year tradition of Clean Energy Research here at the university and the Delaware Environmental Institute, which is a little over a year old. But again, building on important Foundational activities and a number of colleges across the university. And I have a couple of slides just to remind you of the activities of those and the impact and sort of where we're going, you might say in a, in the daily business of the University, independent of what might happen faster. The railroad tracks. Again, just to remind you that the DBI is a little over ten years old. When we talk to the politicians, they like to see some of the numbers on here, such as the investment that the state and others put in, the level of funding that that has yielded sense and the number of jobs it has created. I think perhaps most important all, if you look at the last or the second, third bullets from the bottom, the level of faculty and then of course, student involvement in DBI. And this has really been a catalyst for growing life sciences in a number of units across the campus. And at least conceptually, that's, it's not the template, at least an example of what we would aspire to with our other institutes. And I think we're making great headway there, dan. And of course, has a significant amount of support from the National Science Foundation through the F Score program. It also received one of the large critical zone observatory grants from NSF and number of others that are listed there. And in the top right hand corner, you see that the partners in our environmental research and education activities in other institutions of higher education on the state of Delaware, nature society, and a number of other affiliates, including a growing effort in the area of Water Research and a very strong linkage with the stroud Water Resources Center in Pennsylvania. The Energy Institute was founded a little over two years ago. And again, we skip to the bottom line to make UDL leading resource for energy, education, and innovation of benefit to the, to the state in the nation. And I just wanted to highlight some of the accomplishments of the last year or two. We've been very successful in securing funding. You do. It's one of only six universities to win, both in Energy Frontier Research Center from the Department of Energy and one of the first round of the Advanced Research. >> Okay. >> The arpa E, I'll just stick with the acronym, too many letters in it. And we're part of a couple of more recent arpa E grants. And really a quite a bit of activity in the Institute of energy conversion in the college of earth ocean environment with Vdg, vehicle to grid technology, and of course the wind turbine. And then helping the campus to, to, to walk the walk with the partnership with standard solar. Let's put not quite a megawatt of photovoltaics on roofs in the university. So these are activities that go well beyond the formal structure of the Energy Institute itself. But it's meant to give you a snapshot. Of the really across the board progress that we're making in clean energy research and deployment on campus. Of course, DBI has its own building. And here is the, the, the building for the energy and environmental institutes going forward that the new interdisciplinary science and engineering laboratory at the corner of love at an academy streets. So this is a very substantial commitment to the strategic areas. Really on the main campus is part of our core mission of research and education. And one of the messages I want to get across is that what we envision doing on the Science and Technology Campus is not competing with these activities or with the kinds of investments we need on the main campus. But leveraging those so that we attract additional partners and get the results of our research and teaching out into the world more effectively and more rapidly. So all of this was really just meant to set the stage. So the subtitle here is a vision for partnership opportunity and economic growth. And I think one of the clear messages is that whatever our vision for the Science and Technology campus, it will involve external partnerships. And so we need to think about ways to make those happen that both congruent with our mission and in the national interest and, and attractive to, to partners. And I'll detail that. And of course, in these times, anytime we talk to our political representation, jobs and economic growth are, are at the top of their agenda is, and I think this is an important way for the university to be a part of that. So this is an aerial shot. It says existing site. That's the existing site when acquired at about 14 months ago. And those of you who've driven down south college and, and root four, we'll realize that some of the buildings that you may see from the air, they're no longer exist. In the upper right hand corner is the former Mopar parts building, which now is rubble. And they think the paint plant and some other parts of the assembly plant are also down or are going away rather, rather quickly. I kinda like this shot. I'm not quite sure Hoon And David singletons shop, I, I should attribute this to, but it's a superimposition of the Central Campus. So on the upper right edge, that would be Main Street, the left edge, South college, East Park, and academy street superimposed on the Chrysler site. And if I see in the review or the news journal, but we have plans to move Morris library so the middle of the site, while they'll know somebody wasn't paying attention. It's just to give you an idea of the scale. This is a lot of space, and I'm sure we're going to be doing things there long after I'm retired from the university. Some of you may have greater longevity and I hope that you do. So you know, where do you take the first byte and all of this? And what, what ought we think about doing there? Well, what are the things that we did about a year ago was to sit down and think about not just our areas of strength and our strategic directions, but where we were building partnerships that could help us to build more significant activities on this site. And so working together with Pat Harker and calm Apple and Scott Douglas and others, we've crafted what we've referred to as the three plus one strategy. And IT really, the three are a little bit of rearranging of those strategic directions into three themes, energy and the environment. Now combine Life and Health Sciences in national security and defense that recognize both the strategic directions of the university, the areas of strengths that we already have, as well as the partnerships and the partnership opportunities that we've been building. So for example, one of the areas to play a larger role in the area of security and defense. With the brac realignment and the move of personnel, the Aberdeen, and our growing research collaborations and educational collaborations there. Likewise, the formation of the Delaware Health Science Alliance with Thomas Jefferson, Christiana Care, and an Amores, which actually predates our acquisition of the Chrysler site. So these are sort of the three legs of the stool. And the partners, at least some of the partners that we envision helping us to build facilities and activities at the site. So those are the areas again, of you. The strength that we think align well with national priorities, the focus of our strategic and investments in initiatives on campus with things like the institutes, the ice Lab, and the focus of major external partnership efforts. And these are all meant to be broadly construed. One of the things that we'll be doing with the research magazine coming out this spring is focusing on making people more safe and secure. And one of the topics in that, I think I see Robin Morgan back there who will be drafting an article on food safety. So the whole arena of safety and security in the modern world, I think is part of that. And the plus one, and all of this is the enabling infrastructure that we will be building probably over decades on this site in concert with, with these and other partners. To again, just to remind you of the Delaware Health Science Alliance. Hopefully you have seen some of the activities of that and are issues of their research magazine and MU daily. There will be another conference coming up in May. Among the four partners in the the Health Science Alliance, both existing collaborative research activities that have been funded internally. Among those four partners, insignificant proposal activity's going to federal agencies like the National Science Foundation that we think can take this to a higher level. Of course, one of the interests of our partners to Thomas Jefferson is to have a clinical campus located on, on the Science and Technology Campus. So that there would be both residences and training facilities for third, fourth year medical students who are trading in Delaware hospitals. Again, connected to our health education efforts on the, at the university. And of course, Dean Cathy Matt is the executive director of this. So it's very much wired into to what we're trying to do is as an institution, I mentioned brac and Aberdeen proving ground. We're already collaborating with Aberdeen and a number of areas from advanced composites to electronics to to business and finance. You know, when you think about cybersecurity, the interests of the military aren't that different from JP Morgan Chase. They both have large databases that they would like other people not to, to wreak havoc with. We signed the cooperative research and development agreement about a year ago. And under that agreement, we now have approximately 20 statements of work signed or in progress. These are our individual projects. We have a joint initiative to look at at needs that we might need. And our hope is that we would be able to attract to the site a university affiliated research center. And certainly other opportunities for collaboration with, with contractors were also engaged in a number of educational activities already with Aberdeen. Alright, this isn't just about the mercenary side of things. There's a strong educational component. We're already teaching courses on site there. They have tremendous manpower needs going forward. Looking at the need for about 3 thousand people over, over the next five years. And we are the closest research one university to them. And so they're very interested our ability to not only produce newly minted degrees, but to help to educate the personnel and provide professional development for the large numbers of people they already have on site. In energy, what we envision building is a strong UV base Research and Education Institute with a strong national laboratory partnerships. We have been engaged in discussions, was one of the national laboratories for more than a year. And we have signed several memoranda of understanding, including on joint appointments. We are Exploring joint initiatives for the DOE budget for fiscal 12, we have expressions of interest from them of having a permanent presence on the Science and Technology campus. So you may not be aware that a number of the Department of Energy Laboratories have satellite facilities on other campuses around the country. The University of Maryland, for example, has one, and we think that could be a very important anchor for our energy activities on the Science and Technology campus. And we're a long way away, many more steps to be taken. But that's the kind of, of, of initiatives that we're working on there. And again, the idea is, is to provide the innovation and research, but really to work with partners both and the federal government and in industry to get our people and our R and D out into the world as quickly and as effectively as possible. So a couple of more real estate kinds of slides. These are some of the ideas that are coming out of our new university architect and facilities. And the working group that we've put together that meets on a regular basis, sort of dividing this large 272 acre site up into two zones. I didn't bring along the utilities map. That's something I tend to not even think about as being important. On the sixth day, I thought the good Lord put in all of the sewers and water lines and gas unfortunately didn't. And so you have to think about where those things go, as well as what you might do above the ground. And in fact, what you might do aboveground drives where you run some of those, those utility. So that this is a schematic of several potential phases of the development. And I want to point out the density of this. You know, many of you may have visited tech parks around the country and they can be rather sterile laboratory building stuck out in a sea of asphalt and everybody leaves at five o'clock. And the idea here is higher density of occupancy, residency, retail conference facilities. Really building a community on this site. Not just a place that people drive up to go to work at from, from eight to five. And I think that gives us a very interesting opportunity. So you'll see both in the vision, denser occupancy of the site, as well as there's probably greater vertical height than we have on campus where we don't, we haven't traditionally built things more than about three stories. Some of the buildings here will be, be higher than that. Again, maybe that's ten or more years from now. >> Where do you start? >> Well, here, here's a suggestion for phase one. The one piece of Chrysler fight remaining is the headquarters building that's being renovated and repurposed for health science activities, including the College of Health Sciences and the Delaware Rehabilitation Institute. And the kinds of of buildings that might be in the first group around that probably targeted mainly health science related activities. And Thomas Jefferson, you see four-story buildings here in the schematic. The other piece in the top left of the purple outline is the idea of a new train station in transportation hub. And so we've also been working with the state and with EDA and others Department of Transportation, where there's a tiger to planning grant for that. But the idea of making this a center for commuter rail, we don't currently have commuter rail to the South. I think there are also, as we think about personal transportation of the future, hopefully fewer cars on campus, but maybe fueled in different ways. Opportunities for things like hydrogen fueling their plugin for electric vehicles or plug-in hybrids and so forth. So I think the, the interface on this side of the railroad tracks with how people get to and from that also opportunity of also operate also offers opportunities for the way in which we can have greener transportation in the future. So again, as I said that this talk is about vision. Hopefully you don't think we're smoking something, a realistic vision, but one that I think connects pretty well with what we're trying to do as an institution. A couple of other slides that I swipe from people again, that there needs to be some addition of a rail line for commuter rail purposes. So some planning of of of what the rail and the rearrangements of that might be. And then the other part is just the timeline. And we are now here. You see there's already know, and I hope by the end of 2 thousand and certainly than opportunities for new things to go up depending on the, the opportunities that that we're able to, to make arise between now and then. I think the other important point is that I think the vision is an important one week. What we don't want to build, there's a strip mall, right? And to put up whatever someone comes along with with funds for and so as various opportunities have come along, I can assure you that there is an ongoing discussion of, Is this part of the kind of vision that I've articulated here? Does it, you know, are there reasons to do it that are part of our broader goals, not not just for the money. So I'd be happy to answer any questions. But I from from the presentations that we've given so far, where there have been people from the internal campus community who've seen them in general. The response has been, oh, gee, I'm I'm glad to know some of that. And I'm sure if I were to come back six months or a year from now. Hopefully there'll be some progress, some of the details will change, but this gives you the direction that we've set out on. So thank you very much. >> I will be happy to answer your questions. >> Yes. >> This is completely selfish. >> Has anybody thought of a, a football and bike bridge between the southernmost part of the campus and the little cul-de-sac that spread across root four. >> And we'd just be lovely. But those of us Salford fruit for if we could not have to go on to get over four. >> Yeah. >> If we could just get right over root for onto the campus, that would just be a really nice day. Toss out. >> It has not been looked that will look like that. >> Although I think as you saw, the the initial development is likely to be towards the northeast corner and site. Yeah. They're probably not going to be anything down on our side. A report for a while. Thank you. Good idea. >> But yes, very nice presentation. I'm wondering if you could arrange to have your PowerPoint's and attach is linked to the new Karen has them. >> So I will leave that magic that hurt. >> Yes. >> Question. I saw you had balloon Brown radiation on your last charter. I'm curious if you have good information on how much of that is needed. >> And that's why I brought miosis. >> Didn't question about below where the video I'm going to refer that to. >> So yes, we did a lot of estimates before. We have higher. >> The primary, the nice thing is, is that prior to 1950 was actually farmland. >> So there is some contaminants, but it's relatively minor nature. And what you would think typically some car lubricants, things like that. Yes. >> I'm curious if it has been considered to put space for graduate students on the, on the new site that's been discussed in the graduate students. >> And I'm curious if that's on your radar as well. Well, I you know, again, certainly housing for medical students and others. I think I don't think we specifically discussed that, but there is certainly awareness that more graduate student housing is something that we need. And that would kind of make sense for that to be a place to put it. Then recognized the need and the RATIONAL_A. And there I wouldn't say we've gotten appointments. Yes. When when do you see the first timeline for first occupancy of the site while I guess people are already in the headquarters building. And in fact, that was retrofitted with some additional HVAC to make it more habitable. Jj, I don't think well, that won't be completely evacuated at any point in the renovation. >> Will now now there will continue to be some people working down there. >> Any renovation to the administration building that could take 12 to 18 months, depending on financing and sequencing. >> Major renovation of that building is both resource and time dependent, but there are people in the facility today that will stay there yet. >> So there will be continuous occupancy, occupancy data for some months. Pass one of these. And Emily now, or who is in that building now, is largely with the people who were working on that side doing solely renovations. Planet Earth, two prominent all sciences Portugal. >> I could add to that. >> The planning for the renovation of the building for the College of Health Science was actually kind of cool today. So that is two ways. Occupancies at sometime in 2012 and perhaps later, but not now. Did we do thank thank you. >> Sparing form and thank you. >> Okay. I have a quick series of announcements for you to sort of catch you up with what the Executive Committee has been has been doing. We were scheduled to meet on Thursday, the day that the university was closed. And so you'll see that there's a lot of items that are still under consideration by the Executive Committee and the series of announcements. The first is that the we have membership on the RB be ad hoc committee that's been appointed. And the faculty members, as I reported on at the December seventh December Faculty Senate meeting had been appointed and Executive Committee is currently working on the charge that will go to that committee. That committee will begin its meetings this spring. So just updating you on the formation and charged go into the RB be committee. And there's the membership of that particular committee, again, that was reported upon at the December Faculty Senate faculty senate meeting. Also currently under review by Executive Committee is the motion that was presented by Senator Morse and that referred to that if a if there are plans by the administration for reorganization of units within the university, that the appropriate faculty members be informed within one week and that I'm still under discussion and being reviewed by the executive committee. The next item, survey on classroom scheduling system that surgery has been completed by the faculty, the surveys completed by the administration. And our plan is to send a similar survey to all students. By the end of this week. Originally, I'd reported that we were going to try to do that over the winter session. We decided that our numbers would be better and there'd be better participation if we did it during the spring semester. So that is about to be released to the students. And then we will have a report on the results of those surveys at the March Faculty Senate meeting. Also, the Coordinating Committee on Education is working on faculty senate consideration of student evaluations of courses and evaluations of, of teaching that's independent to some additional work that is being done throughout from the provost's office with faculty members concern that same issue. So this is the faculty senate. Activity on that particular item. And also under consideration is again, a point raised by Senator Morse. And on the sixth ten role looking at implications and E1 are the is the spirit of the 610 rule being followed and that is also under consideration by the by the executive committee. And then there was a resolution that was presented in our September 13th on Faculty Senate meeting by centers Galileo Breuning, Hastings Morton is or, and that particular resolution was taken under consideration by executive committee. We had a meeting with that group or some of us from Executive Committee met with those senators in December and a modified resolution as a result of that particular medium will be presented to the faculty senate at the March, at our March meeting. And then also remember we had a discussion on religious holidays on the academic calendar. And following that, discussion items pertained to that are also under consideration by the executive committee. So we spent a long, long time and January ruminating over various issues and we'll have more to report at the March Faculty Senate mean. Any any questions, comments on that brief series of announcements? I just try to let you know that executive committee doesn't forget about the things we need to do on Just wanted to let you know what we're up to. >> Ok. >> Hearing no questions, we'll move on with the agenda. And that is moving on to the consent agenda. We have a series of 16 items that come from the undergraduate studies committee. We have three items that come from the Graduate Studies Committee. Again, just to review for you what it means to come from the consent agenda. Items that are on the Consent Agenda are basically revisions to requirements for existing degree programs. They had been reviewed by either the Undergraduate Studies Committee and or the Graduate Studies Committee. They had been then recommended to the Coordinating Committee. The Coordinating Committee has reviewed those recommendations. And then that's moved on to executive committee who's also reviewed recommendations. So these particular items, 16 items under undergraduate steady zones a through P, and the three items onto the Graduate Studies committee come forward to you in toto to be consideration considered for your approval at this time since they come moved and seconded from the appropriate committees. Are there any items on the Consent Agenda that you wish to have removed to have an individual discussion about. So at this time, I'd pertain Any questions about removing a particular item from the consent agenda. Okay. >> We can distill them. >> This one we really considered a double revisioned. We can have that removed. So these atoms come to you, moved and seconded all those in favor of approval of the items on the consent agenda, please say aye. >> All opposed. >> And so we have approved the items on the consent agenda. Next on our agenda under the regular agenda is one resolution and it's a coming to you as a recommendation from the Faculty Senate Committee on graduate studies with the concurrence of the Coordinating Committee on Education and the executive committee It is request revise the master's degree course requirements and revise a policy statement. And then propose a name change for the Master of Science degree in Fashion Studies to fashion in a parallel studies salary to the resolution resolved that the Faculty Senate approves a name change for the Master of Science and fashion studies to master of science in fashion and apparel steadies effective July first, 2011. Any discussion of this resolution? Yes. Jump her jaw bone curricula and resolution that that's that's handled within the consent agenda. I believe that those items came up through that particular part of the executive. Is that correct? I'm sorry. That's graduated but now you're I'm sorry, John. You are correct that it's coming to you as revising the master's course requirements. Revise the whole statement, and then also the name change. So it's those three items that are under consideration. The revise a master degree in Course Requirements, Advisor Policy Statement and name changes of all bend review by graduate studies committee and recommended by them. Also reviewed and recommended by coordinating committee as well as executive committee. We need we need the sim we need a motion to do than name change. We wouldn't necessarily need a motion to do the revisions to the curriculum and the change to the policy statement and name change. That's why you only see under result that we approve the name change. Any other discussion or questions? >> Okay. >> All those in favor of the name change for the Master of Science and fashion studies to master of science in fashion apparel studies. Please raise your cards. >> Those opposed major has been approved. >> The next the next item on our agenda is under because under excuse me, on the introduction of new business, Are there any ions that come before the senate? I no. Motion that's introduced at this time can be under new motion cannot be acted upon, and instead emotion to referred to committee. Any new business before the Faculty Senate hearing that there's no business before the new fact percentages or I do have a motion to adjourn. Is there a second to that motion? So meeting is adjourned. This is a belated Christmas present to you as we move forward into March and April, there'll be many more items on their agenda under consent and to approve. So consider this a an early dismissal. We won't be happening in March and April.
2010-2011/facsen-20110208.mp3
From Joseph Dombroski May 06, 2020
0 plays
0
0 comments
0
You unliked the media.